Strasburger & Price, LLP Newsletter

  

PERSONAL INJURY

OCTOBER 2005

Prepared by
D. Bradley Kizzia

ADOBE PDF VERSION

PERSONAL INJURY PRACTICE AREA

 

 

Policy's Notice Provision is Condition to Coverage for Advertising Injury Claim

On August 26, 2005, a Texas Court of Appeals considered whether an insured's untimely notice to an insurer of a copyright claim would bar the insured's recovery under an insurance policy as a matter of law, despite the fact that the insurer was not prejudiced by the delay. See PAJ, Inc. d/b/a Prime Art & Jewel v. Hanover Insurance Company, 2005 WL 2046251 *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas, August 26, 2005). This issue has troubled both Texas and Federal courts applying Texas law, leaving an unclear and inconsistent body of law in the state of Texas.

The court in PAJ held that the notice provision is classified as a condition, rather than a covenant, to the insurer's obligations. Id. The court noted that Texas has adopted by statute a policy endorsement requiring prejudice for bodily injury and property damage claims. Before the adoption of this policy endorsement, failure to perform a notice condition was an absolute defense to liability on the policy. Thus, the court interpreted the policy endorsement to only apply to claims for bodily injury and property damage and refused to broaden the endorsement's language or application to an advertising injury.
 

Recent Court Decisions and Legislation

  • The Texas Supreme Court has ruled in Progressive Count Mut. Ins. Co. v. Boyd, 04-0055 (Tex. August 26, 2005) that a trial court did not err in dismissing an uninsured motorist's bad faith claims even though the jury had not yet entered judgment for the insurer with respect to the insured's claim for breach of contract. The Supreme Court held that any error on the part of the trial court was harmless as no basis existed for pursuing a claim for common law bad faith or for damages under Article 21.21 of the Insurance Code in the absence of any contractual right to recovery. While acknowledging that it had left open the possibility that an insured might be entitled to bad faith damages even in the absence of coverage in cases such as American Motorist Ins. Co. v. Fodge, 63 S.W.3d 801, 804 (Tex. 2001), the court noted that such an extra-contractual obligation could only arise if the insurer's conduct was extreme and produced damages unrelated to and independent of the policy claim. In this case, the insured's claims were that the insurer had improperly denied his UIM claim and had failed to fairly investigate the facts of the accident, which the court found neither extreme nor independent of the policy claim.
     
  • In Lamar Homes, Inc. v. Mid Continent Casualty Co., No. 04-51074 (5th Cir. Oct 3, 2005), the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals certified to the Texas Supreme Court what it regards as unresolved issues pertaining to the determination of whether claims of defective construction under a construction contract are covered by a liability policy providing for coverage of property damage caused by an occurrence. If so, the Court certified the further question of whether a claim under the policy for defense costs incurred by the insured after a defense has been refused is subject to the 18% penalty under Article 21.55 of the Texas Insurance Code. The opinion notes that these coverage issues are already before the Supreme Court in Gehan Homes, Ltd. v. Employers Mut. Cas. Co., 146 S.W. 3d 833 (Tex. App.—Dallas, 2004, pet. filed), in which briefing on the merits has been requested.

In our previous newsletters, we reported on new federal and state legislation. In addition to previous reports, you may also be interested in the following:

  • S.B.15, New state law regarding asbestos and silica claims.
  • S.256, New federal law entitled "The Bankruptcy Abe Prevention and Consumer Protection Act."
      

Michael Keeley Voted Chair-Elect

Strasburger partner, Michael Keeley, has been voted chair-elect of the American Bar Association’s Fidelity & Surety Law Committee. Mr. Keeley will serve a one-year term as chair-elect beginning in August 2005. Upon completion of his one-year term in August 2006, he will assume the role of committee chair for the upcoming year. Mr. Keeley currently serves as the chair of Strasburger's fidelity & surety, construction, and insurance litigation and counsel practice areas.

  

 

     
STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP    DISCLAIMER
This publication provides information on general legal issues and is not intended to provide advice on any specific legal matters.