<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <channel>
      <title>Strasburger Business &amp; Law News</title>
	  <atom:link href="http://www.strasburger.com/rss/business.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
      <link>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business.asp</link>
      <description>Strasburger Business &amp; Law RSS feed</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>webmaster@strasburger.com (Michael MacNaughton)</webMaster>
	  	  	  	        <item>
         <title>Jury Deliberation of Evidence for Future Damages in Patent Cases. Ripple Effect of 2006 U.S. Supreme Court Decision.</title>
         <link>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/Future-Damages-in-Patent-Cases.htm</link>
         <description>Jury Deliberation of Evidence for Future Damages in Patent Cases. Ripple Effect of 2006 U.S. Supreme Court Decision. by  &lt;a href="http://www.strasburger.com/bios/attorney_bios.asp?atty=976"&gt;Richard D. Fladung&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Permanent injunctions against patent infringers are no longer considered a matter of course but are being analyzed according to the 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision entitled &#60;&#101;&#109;&#62;eBay Inc. v. MercExchange&#60;&#47;&#101;&#109;&#62;, 547 U.S. 388. When a patent owner cannot satisfy the eBay four-factor test, courts are awarding future damages in lieu of a permanent injunction. Applying the eBay four-factor test, a patent owner must demonstrate....</description>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		 <guid>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/Future-Damages-in-Patent-Cases.htm</guid>
           </item>
	  
	  
	  	  	        <item>
         <title>Drafting Letters Of Intent</title>
         <link>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/drafting-letters-of-intent.htm</link>
         <description>Drafting Letters Of Intent by  &lt;a href="http://www.strasburger.com/bios/attorney_bios.asp?atty=540"&gt;Steven P. Watten&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Letters of intent and their benefit to structuring transactions have been debated for years.  While they are commonly used, lawyers generally advise their clients to avoid them because they are usually drafted hastily by laymen and, if not properly drafted, could have significant adverse legal consequences....</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		 <guid>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/drafting-letters-of-intent.htm</guid>
           </item>
	  
	  	        <item>
         <title>Exporters Beware: U.S. Government Significantly Steps Up Enforcement Efforts</title>
         <link>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/exporters_beware_US_Gov_steps_up_enforcement.htm</link>
         <description>Exporters Beware: U.S. Government Significantly Steps Up Enforcement Efforts by &lt;a href="http://www.strasburger.com/bios/attorney_bios.asp?atty=930"&gt;Douglas N. Jacobson&lt;/a&gt; , &lt;a href="http://www.strasburger.com/bios/attorney_bios.asp?atty=666"&gt;Mark J. Andrews&lt;/a&gt; and  &lt;a href="http://www.strasburger.com/bios/attorney_bios.asp?atty=1103"&gt;Laura Martino&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Earlier this year, a Minnesota company was hit with $800,000 in criminal and civil penalties for omitting certain facts in license applications submitted to the U.S. Department of Commerce&#8242;s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) for the export of seismic testing equipment to India. These penalties were assessed for violations of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), which impose licensing requirements and other controls on the export of controlled goods, software and technology. Last year, the maximum penalty would have been $122,000 for the same infractions....</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		 <guid>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/exporters_beware_US_Gov_steps_up_enforcement.htm</guid>
           </item>
	  
	  	        <item>
         <title>THE IMPACT OF THE HART-SCOTT-RODINO (&#8220;HSR&#8221;) ACT ON YOUR TRANSACTION</title>
         <link>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/Hart-Scott-Rodino-HSR-Act.htm</link>
         <description>Protecting Your Invention Part 3: The Provisional Application by  &lt;a href="http://www.strasburger.com/bios/attorney_bios.asp?atty=454"&gt;Tom Burton&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;On February 28, 2008, the Federal Trade Commission made its annual adjustments to the jurisdictional and filing fee thresholds under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the &#8220;HSR Act&#8221;). As you will see below, the HSR Act can &#8220;sneak up&#8221; on those involved in a business transaction, and failure to take its requirements into account at the beginning of a transaction can have an adverse impact on the deal and the parties involved....</description>
         <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		 <guid>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/Hart-Scott-Rodino-HSR-Act.htm</guid>
           </item>
	  
	  	  	     <item>
         <title>Choice of Business Entity: Do Self-Employment Taxes Disfavor Limited Liability Companies?</title>
         <link>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/self-employment_tax_considerations_in_choice_of_entity.htm</link>
         <description>Choice of Business Entity: Do Self-Employment Taxes Disfavor Limited Liability Companies? by  &lt;a href="http://www.strasburger.com/bios/attorney_bios.asp?atty=931"&gt;James R. Browne&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Prior to 2007, many Texas based businesses conducted operations through a limited partnership because partnerships were not subject to Texas franchise tax. With the changes in the franchise tax law eliminating the tax favored status of partnerships, businesses are more likely to consider alternative legal entity forms....</description>
         <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		 <guid>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/self-employment_tax_considerations_in_choice_of_entity.htm</guid>
           </item>
	  
	  	     <item>
         <title>Protecting Your Invention Part VI: Infringement Not Protecting The Patent Portfolio</title>
         <link>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/protecting_your_invention_part6.htm</link>
         <description>Protecting Your Invention Part VI: Infringement Not Protecting The Patent Portfolio  by  &lt;a href="http://www.strasburger.com/bios/attorney_bios.asp?atty=633"&gt;David G. Moore&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Congratulations, your hard work and effort has paid off and you have received a patent on your invention from the U.S. Patent Office. After admiring the ribbon copy of your patent, you notice an advertisement in a magazine for an exact replica of your invention being sold by a company other than yours. After you have recovered from aspirating your morning cup of coffee, what should you do? Call the police? Nope. Call the Patent Office? Nope. Call the President ? Nope. Call your lawyer? Yes. The patent which has been issued grants you the right to exclude others from making, using or selling your invention in the United States for approximately 20 years. If your patent is infringed, the Patent Office, police and the President are not going to help you. You have to go to a United States District Court and file a lawsuit asking for relief if an amicable resolution cannot be reached with the infringer....</description>
         <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		 <guid>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/protecting_your_invention_part6.htm</guid>
           </item>
	  
	  	        <item>
         <title>Company E-mail Policies May Defeat Attorney-Client Privilege</title>
         <link>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/company_email_policies.htm</link>
         <description>Company E-mail Policies May Defeat Attorney-Client Privilege  by  &lt;a href="http://www.strasburger.com/bios/attorney_bios.asp?atty=1112"&gt;Martin Thornthwaite&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Businesses, employees, and their attorneys should be aware of the effect company computer system and e-mail policies can have on the attorney-client and work product privileges. According to the latest surveys conducted by the American Management Association and The ePolicy Institute, 76% of organizations have e-mail usage and content policies, and 55% of organizations monitor employee e-mail...</description>
         <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		 <guid>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/company_email_policies.htm</guid>
           </item>
	  
	        <item>
         <title>Business Update -- Revised Form I-9 For Employment Eligibility Verification</title>
         <link>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/revised_form_I-9.htm</link>
         <description>Business Update -- Revised Form I-9 For Employment Eligibility Verification  by  &lt;a href="http://www.strasburger.com/bios/attorney_bios.asp?atty=940"&gt;Kelly D. Herrera&lt;/a&gt; and   &lt;a href="http://www.strasburger.com/bios/attorney_bios.asp?atty=1112"&gt;Martin Thornthwaite&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (&#8220;USCIS&#8221;) recently announced that Form I-9, the Employment Eligibility Verification form, had been revised and was available beginning November 7, 2007. Employers should use revised Form I-9 as of November 7 but have until December 26, 2007 to transition to the new form before the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency begins enforcing penalties... </description>
         <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		 <guid>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/revised_form_I-9.htm</guid>
           </item>
	  
	  	  	  	  	        <item>
         <title>409A News Flash: Treasury and IRS Do About Face And Fully Postpone Effective Date of Final 409A Regulations Until January 1, 2009</title>
         <link>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/effective_date_409A_regulations_postponed_by_IRS.htm</link>
         <description>409A News Flash: Treasury and IRS Do About Face And Fully Postpone Effective Date of Final 409A Regulations Until January 1, 2009 by  &lt;a href="http://www.strasburger.com/bios/attorney_bios.asp?atty=667"&gt;Luke D. Bailey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;409A &#8220;Good Faith&#8221; Compliance Period For Operational As Well As Documentary Compliance Now Extended Through December 31, 2008....</description>
         <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		 <guid>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/effective_date_409A_regulations_postponed_by_IRS.htm</guid>
           </item>
	  
	  	  	  	        <item>
         <title>Protecting Your Invention Part 5: Protecting The Patent Portfolio</title>
         <link>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/protecting_your_invention_part5.htm</link>
         <description>Protecting Your Invention Part 5: Protecting The Patent Portfolio by  &lt;a href="http://www.strasburger.com/bios/attorney_bios.asp?atty=633"&gt;David G. Moore&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;The intellectual property of a company may be the most important asset and in fact, may be the only asset of a small company. Protecting the inventions and other intellectual property is not just a matter of good business, it may be a matter of survival of the business....</description>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		 <guid>http://www.strasburger.com/calendar/news/business/protecting_your_invention_part5.htm</guid>
           </item>
	  


		   





   </channel>
</rss>
